Commissioner v. Hickman

68 F.2d 997, 13 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 635, 1934 U.S. App. LEXIS 5052, 1934 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) 9132
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided March 5, 1934·No. Nos. 6976, 6977·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Board of Tax Appeals decided that certain expenditures made in the drilling of an oil well are returnable to the respondents as taxpayers through depreciation rather than through depletion. Since the Board’s decision, the opposite view has been adopted by the Supreme Court. United States v. Dakota-Montana Oil Co., 288 U. S. 459, 53 S. Ct. 435, 77 L. Ed. 893; Petroleum Exploration v. Burnet, 288 U. S. 467, 53 S. Ct. 439, 77 L. Ed. 898. Therefore the petitions for review are granted, and the causes remanded for fürther proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commissioner v. Hickman, 68 F.2d 997, 13 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 635, 1934 U.S. App. LEXIS 5052, 1934 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) 9132 (5th Cir. 1934).

68 F.2d 997 (Commissioner v. Hickman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Dakota-Montana Oil Co.
288 U.S. 459 (Supreme Court, 1933)
Petroleum Exploration v. Burnet
288 U.S. 467 (Supreme Court, 1933)