Commissioner v. Harriman Ripley & Co.
202 F.2d 280
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided March 6, 1953·No. Nos. 10911, 10912·Published·Cited by 6 cases
Opinion
The Tax Court has allowed respondent, a taxpayer, certain amortization deductions claimed to be authorized by a closing agreement. Under the facts as stipulated the Tax Court, 17 T.C. 516, has properly construed and applied the closing agreement. The decisions will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Commissioner v. Harriman Ripley & Co., 202 F.2d 280 (3d Cir. 1953).
202 F.2d 280 (Commissioner v. Harriman Ripley & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Zaentz v. Commissioner
90 T.C. No. 49 (U.S. Tax Court, 1988)
Estate of Johnson v. Commissioner
88 T.C. No. 14 (U.S. Tax Court, 1987)
Avco Mfg. Corp. v. Commissioner
25 T.C. 975 (U.S. Tax Court, 1956)