Commissioner v. Dahl
96 F.2d 1016, 21 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 297, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 3616, 21 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 297
This text of 96 F.2d 1016 (Commissioner v. Dahl) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Commissioner v. Dahl, 96 F.2d 1016, 21 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 297, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 3616, 21 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 297 (9th Cir. 1938).
Opinion
Upon motion of counsel for petitioner, counsel for respondent consenting thereto, it is ordered that the petition to review in this cause be dismissed, that a judgment of dismissal be filed and entered accordingly, and that the mandate of this court issue forthwith.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
96 F.2d 1016, 21 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 297, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 3616, 21 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 297, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commissioner-v-dahl-ca9-1938.