Commissioner v. Banks

542 U.S. 964

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Commissioner v. Banks. Read the opinion of the Court — 543 U.S. 426 →

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided September 28, 2004·No. No. 03-892; No. 03-907·Published

Opinion

C. A. 6th Cir.; C. A. 9th Cir. Motion of respondents for divided argument granted. Motion of respondents for additional time for oral argument denied. Motion of respondent Banks to allow James R. Carty to argue pro hac vice granted. Motion of the Acting Solicitor General to allow David B. Salmons to argue pro hac vice granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commissioner v. Banks, 542 U.S. 964 (2004).

Pincite

542 U.S. 964 (Commissioner v. Banks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.