Commissioner v. Bank of America

123 F.2d 64, 28 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 230, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 2624, 28 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 230
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedOctober 28, 1941
DocketNo. 9959
StatusPublished

This text of 123 F.2d 64 (Commissioner v. Bank of America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commissioner v. Bank of America, 123 F.2d 64, 28 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 230, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 2624, 28 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 230 (9th Cir. 1941).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On joint motion of counsel for respective parties, and good cause therefor appearing, it is ordered that the petitions to review in this cause be dismissed, that a judgment be filed and entered accordingly, and that the mandate of this court in this cause issue forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
123 F.2d 64, 28 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 230, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 2624, 28 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 230, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commissioner-v-bank-of-america-ca9-1941.