Commissioner of the Department of Transportation v. Hooper
This text of 634 S.W.2d 596 (Commissioner of the Department of Transportation v. Hooper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
The issues before the Court in the case at bar are identical to those decided on this date in the case of Commissioner of the Department of Transportation of the State of Tennessee v. James Hall, et ux., Tenn., 635 S.W.2d 110 (1982). The facts, except for some minor differences, are almost identical. The Hooper trial occurred on July 9, 1979, one week after the Hall trial. In Hooper, Mr. Foster, rather than Mr. Martin, was the defendants’ second expert witness. However, in Hooper, the DOT did not attempt to take depositions from either expert. Furthermore, the record in Hooper is completely silent with respect to the exact moment when the motion for a continuance was made. Since the record in the case at bar is even less developed than that presented to the Court in Hall, the Court must reverse the Court of Appeals’ holding that the trial judge abused his discretion by not granting a continuance, and reinstate the trial court’s judgment. Costs of this appeal will be borne by the DOT.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
634 S.W.2d 596, 1982 Tenn. LEXIS 334, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commissioner-of-the-department-of-transportation-v-hooper-tenn-1982.