Commissioner of Social Services v. Connolly

303 A.D.2d 754, 756 N.Y.S.2d 866, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3447
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 31, 2003
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 303 A.D.2d 754 (Commissioner of Social Services v. Connolly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commissioner of Social Services v. Connolly, 303 A.D.2d 754, 756 N.Y.S.2d 866, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3447 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

—In a paternity and child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 5, Paul Connolly appeals from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Hudson, J.), entered December 21, 2001, which, after a hearing, determined that he was the father of the subject child. Justice Feuerstein has been substituted for the late Justice O’Brien (see 22 NYCRR 670.1 [c]).

Ordered that on the court’s own motion, the appellant’s notice of appeal is treated as an application for leave to appeal, and leave to appeal is granted (see CPLR 5701 [c]); and it is further,

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The appellant seeks to apply the doctrine of equitable estoppel to support his claim that it would be inequitable to him and contrary to the best interests of the child to allow the mother to assert a claim of paternity 14 years after the child was born. However, the Family Court properly refused to apply the doctrine of equitable estoppel and that determination is in the best interests of the child (see Matter of Haynes v Martin, 281 AD2d 480 [2001]; Jean Maby H v Joseph H., 246 AD2d 282, 285 [1998]; Matter of Ettore I. v Angela D., 127 AD2d 6 [1987]). The child never considered his mother’s former husband to be his father, nor did he have any ongoing relationship with him. Moreover, the child was aware that the appellant was his father from an early age. Accordingly, the order of filiation was properly entered.

The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Feuerstein, J.P., S. Miller, Friedmann and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Onorina C.T. v. Ricardo R.E.
2019 NY Slip Op 3345 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Suffolk County Department of Social Services Ex Rel. Christopher C. v. James D.
2017 NY Slip Op 1369 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Ruby M.M. v. Moses K.
18 A.D.3d 471 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
303 A.D.2d 754, 756 N.Y.S.2d 866, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3447, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commissioner-of-social-services-v-connolly-nyappdiv-2003.