Commissioner of Revenue Services v. Estate of Culpeper

493 A.2d 297, 4 Conn. App. 249, 1985 Conn. App. LEXIS 1022
Connecticut Appellate Court·Decided June 11, 1985·No. 3318·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The commissioner of revenue services appealed to the Superior Court from an order and decree of the Norwalk Probate Court finding that no succession tax was due to the state of Connecticut from the estate of Daphne Culpeper (estate). In his reasons of appeal, the commissioner stated that the decedent left the residue of her estate to an alleged charitable foundation to be formed after her death. Inasmuch as the charitable foundation was not structured within five years after her death as required by General Statutes § 12-347, the commissioner claimed that the estate is liable for succession taxes in an amount exceeding one million dollars.

Kalman Nulman and Joseph Weill (the applicants), are former co-executors of the estate, who were removed because of their alleged failure timely to form [250] the charitable foundation. They sought to intervene in the appeal to the Superior Court, claiming that they may be personally responsible for any succession tax which may be recovered against the estate. From the trial court’s denial of their motion to intervene, they have appealed to this court.

Subsequent to oral argument of this appeal, we learned that the Superior Court case in which the applicants sought to intervene has been withdrawn.1 Therefore, the applicant’s appeal is moot. See Jones v. Ricker, 172 Conn. 572, 375 A.2d 1034 (1977).

The appeal is dismissed.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commissioner of Revenue Services v. Estate of Culpeper, 493 A.2d 297, 4 Conn. App. 249, 1985 Conn. App. LEXIS 1022 (Colo. Ct. App. 1985).

493 A.2d 297 (Commissioner of Revenue Services v. Estate of Culpeper) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Doe v. Hartford Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.
900 A.2d 572 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2006)
Hughes v. Budny, No. Cv 96 0070449 (Nov. 18, 1996)
1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 9025 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1996)
Matey v. City of Waterbury
585 A.2d 1260 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1991)