Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Wire Wheel Corporation of America
This text of 46 F.2d 1013 (Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Wire Wheel Corporation of America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Petitioner,
v.
WIRE WHEEL CORPORATION OF AMERICA, Respondent.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
G. A. Youngquist, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Andrew D. Sharpe and Sewall Key, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen. (C. M. Charest, Gen. Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, and Allin H. Pierce, Sp. Atty., Bureau of Internal Revenue, both of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for petitioner.
Hugh Satterlee and I. Herman Sher, both of New York City, and Albert S. Lisenby, of Washington, D. C. (Weill, Wolff & Satterlee, of New York City, of counsel), for respondent.
Before L. HAND, SWAN, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Decision affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
46 F.2d 1013, 9 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 859, 1931 U.S. App. LEXIS 2558, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commissioner-of-internal-revenue-v-wire-wheel-corporation-of-america-ca2-1931.