Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Sol Smith

Fifth Circuit

Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Sol Smith

198 F.2d 1020, 42 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 559, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 4439

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedSeptember 25, 1952

Docket14042

StatusPublished

This text of 198 F.2d 1020 (Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Sol Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Sol Smith, 198 F.2d 1020, 42 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 559, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 4439 (5th Cir. 1952).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be heard upon the motion filed by respondent for a judgment affirming the decision of the Tax Court of *1021 the United States in the above entitled and numbered cause, for the reason that the decisions of this Court in Commissioner v. Guminski, 198 F.2d 265, and Commissioner v. Gentry, 198 F.2d 267, were concerned with the same issues of fact and law as in this cause, counsel for the petitioner entering “no objection” to said motion; and in accordance with the stipulation of the parties filed April 28, 1952:

On consideration whereof, It is now here ordered and adjudged by this Court in accordance with the motion of respondent for judgment, and the stipulation of the parties filed and approved by this Court on April 28, 1952, that the decision of the Tax Court of the United States in the above entitled and numbered cause be, and the same is hereby, Affirmed.

It is further ordered that a certified copy of the Motion of respondent for judgment, stipulation of April 28, 1952, and of this Judgment be forwarded to the Tax Court of the United States.

Affirmed on Stipulation of the Parties.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be heard upon the motion filed by respondent for a judgment affirming the decision of the Tax Court of *1021 the United States in the above entitled and numbered cause, for the reason that the decisions of this Court in Commissioner v. Guminski, 198 F.2d 265, and Commissioner v. Gentry, 198 F.2d 267, were concerned with the same issues of fact and law as in this cause, counsel for the petitioner entering “no objection” to said motion; and in accordance with the stipulation of the parties filed April 28, 1952:

On consideration whereof, It is now here ordered and adjudged by this Court in accordance with the motion of respondent for judgment, and the stipulation of the parties filed and approved by this Court on April 28, 1952, that the decision of the Tax Court of the United States in the above entitled and numbered cause be, and the same is hereby, Affirmed.

It is further ordered that a certified copy of the Motion of respondent for judgment, stipulation of April 28, 1952, and of this Judgment be forwarded to the Tax Court of the United States.

Affirmed on Stipulation of the Parties.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

198 F.2d 1020, 42 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 559, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 4439, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commissioner-of-internal-revenue-v-sol-smith-ca5-1952.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack