Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. RAINIER BREWING COMPANY
Opinion
This, as the companion case of Seattle Brewing and Malting Co., 9 Cir., 165 F.2d 216, presented to the Tax Court “hybrid questions of mixed law and fact [and] their resolution because of the fact element will * * * afford little concrete guidance to future cases.” We hence do not consider the petitioner’s contention that “the facts found fall short of meeting statutory requirements.” Bingham v. Commissioner, 325 U.S. 365, 370, 65 S.Ct. 1232, 89 L.Ed. 1670; Choate v. Commissioner, 324 U.S. 1, 65 S.Ct. 469, 89 L.Ed. 653.
The decision of the Tax Court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
165 F.2d 217 (Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. RAINIER BREWING COMPANY) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.