Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. McNutt Company
This text of 324 F.2d 957 (Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. McNutt Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
324 F.2d 957
64-1 USTC P 9138
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Petitioner,
v.
McNUTT-BOYCE COMPANY, Respondent.
No. 20341.
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.
Dec. 20, 1963.
Crane C. Hauser, Chief Counsel, I.R.S., Glen E. Hardy, Atty., I.R.S., Louis F. Oberdorfer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, David O. Walter, William A. Friedlander, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Junius H. Payne, Jr., Alexandria, La., Gerald D. Morgan, Arthur Peter, Jr., Lee I. Park, Washington, D.C., Hamel, Morgan, Park & Saunders, Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Before RIVES, JONES and WISDOM, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
This controversy between a taxpayer and the Commissioner of Internal Revenue was ably discussed and properly decided by the Tax Court. McNutt-Boyce Company v. Commissioner, 38 T.C. 462. Its decision is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
324 F.2d 957, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commissioner-of-internal-revenue-v-mcnutt-company-ca5-1963.