Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. J. P. Quirk. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Estate of W. M. Wright, Deceased, Mrs. Ollie Belle Wright

196 F.2d 1022, 42 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 294, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 3482
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJune 12, 1952
Docket13783_1
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 196 F.2d 1022 (Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. J. P. Quirk. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Estate of W. M. Wright, Deceased, Mrs. Ollie Belle Wright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. J. P. Quirk. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Estate of W. M. Wright, Deceased, Mrs. Ollie Belle Wright, 196 F.2d 1022, 42 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 294, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 3482 (5th Cir. 1952).

Opinion

196 F.2d 1022

52-1 USTC P 9356

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
v.
J. P. QUIRK.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
v.
ESTATE of W. M. WRIGHT, Deceased, Mrs. Ollie Belle Wright, Executrix.

Nos. 13782, 13783.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

June 12, 1952.

Helen Goodner, Ellis N. Slack, Robert N. Anderson, Irving I. Axelrad, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., Theron Lamar Caudle, Asst. Atty. Gen., Charles Oliphant, Chief Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, Claude R. Marshall, Sp. Atty., Washington, D.C., for petitioner.

W. H. Harris, Scott R. Williams, Fort Valley, Ga., for respondent.

Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and RUSSELL and STRUM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Appealing from decisions and orders of the Tax Court in the above styled and numbered causes, which by order of this court have been consolidated on appeal, the Commissioner seeks their reversal.

In the opinion of the Tax Court,1 the facts as stipulated and proved are fully and correctly found, and the reasons for the decisions are as carefully and correctly set down.

Agreeing, as we do, with the views, the findings, and conclusions of the Tax Court, we refer to them with approval, and, for the reasons given in its opinions, we affirm the decisions and orders appealed from.

1

15 T.C. 709

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Washington Farms, Inc. v. United States
122 F. Supp. 31 (M.D. Georgia, 1954)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
196 F.2d 1022, 42 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 294, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 3482, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commissioner-of-internal-revenue-v-j-p-quirk-commissioner-of-internal-ca5-1952.