Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Hemenway-Johnson Furniture Co.

174 F.2d 793, 37 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 1515, 1949 U.S. App. LEXIS 4367
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedMay 30, 1949
DocketNo. 12664
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 174 F.2d 793 (Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Hemenway-Johnson Furniture Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Hemenway-Johnson Furniture Co., 174 F.2d 793, 37 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 1515, 1949 U.S. App. LEXIS 4367 (5th Cir. 1949).

Opinion

PER curiam:

The question is whether payments made on some of taxpayer’s outstanding securities were interest which it can deduct from its income for purposes of taxation,' or were dividends paid out. The answer depends on whether the securities are interest bearing debentures, as they purport on their face to be, or are really preferred stock. There are features and facts looking both ways. The Tax Court in a careful opinion held the payments were interest. We affirm that conclusion.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harbour Properties, Inc. v. Commissioner
1973 T.C. Memo. 134 (U.S. Tax Court, 1973)
Brinkley v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.
139 F. Supp. 480 (S.D. West Virginia, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
174 F.2d 793, 37 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 1515, 1949 U.S. App. LEXIS 4367, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commissioner-of-internal-revenue-v-hemenway-johnson-furniture-co-ca5-1949.