Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Hedges. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Childress
This text of 212 F.2d 593 (Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Hedges. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Childress) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
54-1 USTC P 9402
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
v.
HEDGES.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
v.
CHILDRESS.
No. 13700.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
May 10, 1954.
H. Brian Holland, Asst. Atty. Gen., Ellis N. Slack, Helen Goodner, Dudley J. Godfrey, Jr., Charles K. Rice, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., Charles W. Davis, Chief Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Kenneth C. Hawkins, Milton P. Sachman, Thomas E. Grady, Jr., Yakima, Wash., A. R. Kehoe, Jones, Birdseye & Grey, Seattle, Wash., for respondents.
Before STEPHENS, HEALY and POPE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
These matters are here on petition to review a decision of the Tax Cpurt. The judgment of the Tax Court is affirmed on the ground and for the reasons given in its opinion, 18 T.C. 681.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
212 F.2d 593, 45 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 1478, 1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 4442, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commissioner-of-internal-revenue-v-hedges-commissi-ca9-1954.