Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Hedges. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Childress
Opinion
54-1 USTC P 9402
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
v.
HEDGES.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
v.
CHILDRESS.
No. 13700.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
May 10, 1954.
H. Brian Holland, Asst. Atty. Gen., Ellis N. Slack, Helen Goodner, Dudley J. Godfrey, Jr., Charles K. Rice, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., Charles W. Davis, Chief Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Kenneth C. Hawkins, Milton P. Sachman, Thomas E. Grady, Jr., Yakima, Wash., A. R. Kehoe, Jones, Birdseye & Grey, Seattle, Wash., for respondents.
Before STEPHENS, HEALY and POPE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
These matters are here on petition to review a decision of the Tax Cpurt. The judgment of the Tax Court is affirmed on the ground and for the reasons given in its opinion, 18 T.C. 681.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
212 F.2d 593 (Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Hedges. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Childress) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.