Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. ESTATE OF THE DANIEL GARTLING
170 F.2d 73
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedOctober 21, 1948
Docket11826
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases
This text of 170 F.2d 73 (Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. ESTATE OF THE DANIEL GARTLING) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. ESTATE OF THE DANIEL GARTLING, 170 F.2d 73 (9th Cir. 1948).
Opinion
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Petitioner,
v.
ESTATE of Daniel GARTLING, Deceased, and R. N. Weaver, Executor, Respondent.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
*74 Theron Lamar Caudle, Asst. Atty Gen., and Lee A. Jackson and Hilbert P. Zarky, Sp. Assts., for petitioner.
D. Webster Egan, of Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent.
Before MATHEWS, STEPHENS, and BONE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The decision of the Tax Court is affirmed upon the authority of Stilgenbaur v. United States, 9 Cir., 115 F.2d 283.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Pursglove v. Commissioner
20 T.C. 68 (U.S. Tax Court, 1953)
Woody v. Commissioner
19 T.C. 350 (U.S. Tax Court, 1952)
Trousdale v. Commissioner
16 T.C. 1056 (U.S. Tax Court, 1951)
Swiren v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
183 F.2d 656 (Seventh Circuit, 1950)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
170 F.2d 73, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commissioner-of-internal-revenue-v-estate-of-the-daniel-gartling-ca9-1948.