Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Carl H. Conner, Murl Marie Conner, Onyda Laird, and Herman D. Laird
This text of 199 F.2d 369 (Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Carl H. Conner, Murl Marie Conner, Onyda Laird, and Herman D. Laird) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This cause came on to be heard upon the stipulation filed by the parties for a judgment affirming the decision of the Tax Court of the United States in the above-en-titled and numbered cause, in accordance with the decisions of this Court in Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Guminski, 5 Cir., 198 F.2d 265, and Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Gentry, 5 Cir., 198 F.2d 267, rendered July 24, 1952, and in accord-anee with the stipulation of the parties filed March 11, 1952;
On consideration whereof, it is now here ordered and adjudged by this Court in accordance with the stipulation of the parties for judgment, and the stipulation of the *370 parties filed and approved 'by this Court on March 11, 1952, that the decision of the Tax Court of the United States in the aiboveentitled and numbered cause be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.
It is further ordered that a certified copy of the stipulation of the parties for judgment, stipulation of March 11, 1952, and of this judgment be forwarded to the Tax Court of the United States.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
199 F.2d 369, 42 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 699, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 3476, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commissioner-of-internal-revenue-v-carl-h-conner-murl-marie-conner-ca5-1952.