Commissioner of Cattaraugus County Department of Social Services v. Lawrence F.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Commissioner of Cattaraugus County Department of Social Services v. Lawrence F.

216 A.D.2d 947, 629 N.Y.S.2d 706, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7305

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 9, 1995·Published

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Family Court did not abuse its discretion in terminating the Hearing Examiner’s support order directing respondent to pay child support to petitioner for Anthony, his stepson. Respondent objected to the support order on the grounds that it imposed a financial hardship on his family and that petitioner failed to seek support from his stepson’s biological father before bringing this support proceeding against respondent. Petitioner acknowledged that it did not commence a proceeding against Anthony’s biological father until after the support order was issued; that proceeding was pending at the time of entry of the [948]*948order on appeal. Pursuant to Family Court Act § 415, the court is vested with broad discretion to determine when it is appropriate to impose a support obligation upon a stepparent. As this Court recently noted, "biological parents have primary responsibility for child support; stepparents are responsible only if the support from the biological parents is insufficient to keep the child off public assistance [citations omitted]” (Matter of Monroe County Dept. of Social Servs. [Palermo] v Palermo, 192 AD2d 1114). (Appeal from Order of Cattaraugus County Family Court, Nenno, J.—Child Support.) Present—Green, J. P., Pine, Fallon, Callahan and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Family Court did not abuse its discretion in terminating the Hearing Examiner’s support order directing respondent to pay child support to petitioner for Anthony, his stepson. Respondent objected to the support order on the grounds that it imposed a financial hardship on his family and that petitioner failed to seek support from his stepson’s biological father before bringing this support proceeding against respondent. Petitioner acknowledged that it did not commence a proceeding against Anthony’s biological father until after the support order was issued; that proceeding was pending at the time of entry of the [948]*948order on appeal. Pursuant to Family Court Act § 415, the court is vested with broad discretion to determine when it is appropriate to impose a support obligation upon a stepparent. As this Court recently noted, "biological parents have primary responsibility for child support; stepparents are responsible only if the support from the biological parents is insufficient to keep the child off public assistance [citations omitted]” (Matter of Monroe County Dept. of Social Servs. [Palermo] v Palermo, 192 AD2d 1114). (Appeal from Order of Cattaraugus County Family Court, Nenno, J.—Child Support.) Present—Green, J. P., Pine, Fallon, Callahan and Davis, JJ.

Commissioner of Cattaraugus County Department of Social Services v. Lawrence F., 216 A.D.2d 947, 629 N.Y.S.2d 706, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7305 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

216 A.D.2d 947 (Commissioner of Cattaraugus County Department of Social Services v. Lawrence F.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related