Commercial Union Insurance v. Zeagler
172 So. 2d 450, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 3252
Opinion
Because of an apparent conflict of decisions we have heard the parties on both jurisdiction and merits. After oral argument and careful study of the record and briefs, we have concluded that the instant decision of the District Court of Appeal, Third District, does not conflict with any prior decision of this court or another District Court of Appeal. We conclude that the writ of certiorari was improvidently issued and it is, therefore, discharged. Fla.App., 166 So.2d 616.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Commercial Union Insurance v. Zeagler, 172 So. 2d 450, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 3252 (Fla. 1965).
172 So. 2d 450 (Commercial Union Insurance v. Zeagler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sykes v. Fireman's Fund Insurance
269 F. Supp. 229 (S.D. Florida, 1967)
Sterns v. M. F. A. Mutual Insurance Co.
401 S.W.2d 510 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1966)
American Fidelity Fire Insurance Company v. Clark
174 So. 2d 106 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1965)