Commercial Union Insurance v. Zeagler
This text of 172 So. 2d 450 (Commercial Union Insurance v. Zeagler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Because of an apparent conflict of decisions we have heard the parties on both jurisdiction and merits. After oral argument and careful study of the record and briefs, we have concluded that the instant decision of the District Court of Appeal, Third District, does not conflict with any prior decision of this court or another District Court of Appeal. We conclude that the writ of certiorari was improvidently issued and it is, therefore, discharged. Fla.App., 166 So.2d 616.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
172 So. 2d 450, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 3252, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commercial-union-insurance-v-zeagler-fla-1965.