Commercial Union Insurance Company, a Massachusetts Corporation, Plaintiff v. Sharon A. Tinnell, and Norman E. Ballowe

833 F.2d 1004, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 15296, 1987 WL 39008
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 20, 1987
Docket87-1030
StatusUnpublished

This text of 833 F.2d 1004 (Commercial Union Insurance Company, a Massachusetts Corporation, Plaintiff v. Sharon A. Tinnell, and Norman E. Ballowe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commercial Union Insurance Company, a Massachusetts Corporation, Plaintiff v. Sharon A. Tinnell, and Norman E. Ballowe, 833 F.2d 1004, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 15296, 1987 WL 39008 (4th Cir. 1987).

Opinion

833 F.2d 1004
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
COMMERCIAL UNION INSURANCE COMPANY, a Massachusetts
Corporation, Plaintiff- Appellee,
v.
Sharon A. TINNELL, Defendant-Appellant,
and
Norman E. Ballowe, Defendant.

No. 87-1030.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Argued: July 6, 1987.
Decided: Nov. 20, 1987.

Before DONALD RUSSELL, WIDENER and K.K. HALL, Circuit Judges.

J. Gorman Rosenberger, Jr. (Robert E. Evans, Thomas L. Phillips, Jr., Kiser, Phillips & Petty on brief) for appellant.

William C. Walker (Everett A. Martin, Jr., Seawell, Dalton, Hughes & Timms on brief) for appellee.

PER CURIAM:

This is an action for a declaratory judgment instituted by the appellee insurer to establish that it was not liable under its homeowner's liability policy issued to its insured Norman E. Ballowe for injuries suffered by the appellant Sharon Tinnell. The appellee relied on the exclusionary language in its policy which stated that "medical payments to others do not apply to bodily injury or property damage which is expected or intended by the insured." It contends that the injuries suffered by the appellant Sharon Tinnell were "expected or intended by the insured" and thus were not covered by the appellee's policy. The facts were largely stipulated. Both parties filed motions for summary judgment. The district judge granted the motion of the appellee insurer for summary judgment on the ground that the injuries suffered by Sharon Tinnell were "expected or intended by the insured," and denied the appellant's motion. This appeal followed. We affirm on the opinion of the district judge. Commercial Union Insurance Company v. Norman F. Ballowe and Sharon A. Tinnell, C/A 86-0049-L (W.D.Va. January 6, 1987).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
833 F.2d 1004, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 15296, 1987 WL 39008, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commercial-union-insurance-company-a-massachusetts-corporation-plaintiff-ca4-1987.