Commercial Union Assurance Co. v. Ryalls
This text of 53 So. 754 (Commercial Union Assurance Co. v. Ryalls) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The majority of the court are of the opinion that the contract as to'the purchase of the land in question is within the protection of the rule announced in the case of Loventhal v. Insurance Co., 112 Ala. 108, 20 South. 419, 33 L. R, A. 258, 57 Am. St. Rep. 17, that the plaintiff had an insurable interest in the property, and that'there was no breach of warranty as to the insured’s interest in the property, as set up by the insurance company in its pleas.
[525]*525The majority are of the further opinion that under all the evidence and the issues of this case the plaintiff was entitled to the general affirmative charge as for the amount recovered. They find no reversible errors in the record; that, if errors there were, they were without injury to the defendant, the plaintiff being entitled to the general affirmative charge as for the damages recovered.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
53 So. 754, 169 Ala. 517, 1910 Ala. LEXIS 175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commercial-union-assurance-co-v-ryalls-ala-1910.