Commercial Nat. Bank v. Hiller

211 F. 337, 128 C.C.A. 16, 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 1749
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 23, 1914·No. Nos. 2517 and 2525·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In these cases we find no error in the rulings and opinion of the District Court. The fact that the cotton in dispute was found in the possession of the bankrupts is controlling. On the claims made therefor the duty of the bankruptcy court was to turn it over to the rightful possessor, the Canal-Louisiana Bank & Trust Company, the only lawful pledgee of the same. If the cotton or the warehouse receipts-even had been retained by the Commercial National Bank, a different case-might have been presented. *

The petition to revise is denied. The decree appealed from is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commercial Nat. Bank v. Hiller, 211 F. 337, 128 C.C.A. 16, 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 1749 (5th Cir. 1914).

211 F. 337 (Commercial Nat. Bank v. Hiller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chandler v. Merchants & Mechanics National Bank
118 S.E. 785 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)
Commercial Germania Trust & Savings Bank v. W. M. Hoyt Co.
205 Ill. App. 352 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1917)
Arbuthnot v. Central Trust Co.
221 F. 16 (Seventh Circuit, 1915)