Commercial Laundries, Inc. v. Eureka Housing Corp.
This text of 775 So. 2d 999 (Commercial Laundries, Inc. v. Eureka Housing Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Because genuine material issues remain for appropriate resolution, including but not necessarily limited to questions of standing, implied actual notice of the interests of the tenant, see Lee County Bank v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 126 So.2d 589 (Fla. 2d DCA 1961); Bodden v. Carbonell, 354 So.2d 927 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978), and laches, see City of Miami v. Carter, 105 So.2d 5 (Fla.1958); City of Miami v. Gates, 393 So.2d 586 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), review denied, 402 So.2d 608 (Fla.1981), the summary judgment reforeclosing the appellant’s leasehold is reversed for further proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
775 So. 2d 999, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16650, 2000 WL 1853624, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commercial-laundries-inc-v-eureka-housing-corp-fladistctapp-2000.