Home/Michigan Supreme Court/Commercial Investment Trust v. Stewart

Commercial Investment Trust v. Stewart

209 N.W. 660, 235 Mich. 502, 1926 Mich. LEXIS 740
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1926·No. Docket No. 103.·Published

Opinion

Clark, J.

H. F. Gaylord was engaged in selling Studebaker automobiles in Ann Arbor. He obtained the cars from the manufacturer in Detroit. The arrangement by which he was permitted to receive, to have, and to sell cars is shown by the document on the following page.

He was indebted to defendant, Stewart, and to satisfy the debt he turned over to Stewart two of the cars mentioned in the above paper. Plaintiff brought replevin and had verdict, but on decision of a reserved motion to direct a verdict, defendant had judgment non obstante. The trial judge did not state his reason or reasons for ordering judgment for defendant. We will assume that he accepted the views of counsel for defendant. Defendant has no assignments of error.

*504 UK31RwFFQvhZmlEAjzBEBsgVKyy6qHJOUdKx3ZOMiN

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commercial Investment Trust v. Stewart, 209 N.W. 660, 235 Mich. 502, 1926 Mich. LEXIS 740 (Mich. 1926).

209 N.W. 660 (Commercial Investment Trust v. Stewart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wails v. Farrington
1911 OK 59 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1911)
Schloss v. Feltus
36 L.R.A. 161 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1895)
Becker v. La Core
211 Mich. 684 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1920)