Commercial Insurance v. Goodwin
This text of 197 S.E.2d 745 (Commercial Insurance v. Goodwin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this suit to recover total disability benefits under a house confining clause of an insurance policy, the pleadings and the evidence in support of defendant’s motion for summary judgment show that there are genuine issues of material fact for jury determination concerning whether the plaintiffs departures from his house were for therapeutic or for personal reasons and whether defendant company waived the policy provision by payments made to plaintiff See United Ins. Co. v. Murray, 113 Ga. App. 138 (147 SE2d 656). The judgment denying defendant’s motion is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
197 S.E.2d 745, 128 Ga. App. 686, 1973 Ga. App. LEXIS 1578, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commercial-insurance-v-goodwin-gactapp-1973.