Commercial Credit Plan, Inc. v. Mills

216 S.E.2d 628, 134 Ga. App. 908, 1975 Ga. App. LEXIS 2214
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 29, 1975·No. 50420·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Bell, Chief Judge.

The automobile finance company has not pierced the defendant’s answer that there was a substitution by judicial decree of his divorced wife as the sole debtor and release of defendant from the obligation and that the company acquiesced in accepting the former wife as the sole obligee. See Loftis Plumbing Co. v. American Surety Co., 74 Ga. App. 590 (40 SE2d 667). We affirm the denial of the motion for summary judgment.

Judgment affirmed.

Webb and Marshall, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commercial Credit Plan, Inc. v. Mills, 216 S.E.2d 628, 134 Ga. App. 908, 1975 Ga. App. LEXIS 2214 (Ga. Ct. App. 1975).

216 S.E.2d 628 (Commercial Credit Plan, Inc. v. Mills) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stratton & McLendon, Inc. v. CAMERON-BROWN COMPANY
231 S.E.2d 447 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1976)