Commercial Credit Corp. v. Pearson

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Commercial Credit Corp. v. Pearson

208 S.E.2d 527, 23 N.C. App. 227, 1974 N.C. App. LEXIS 2059

CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina

DecidedOctober 2, 1974

DocketNo. 7410DC730

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 208 S.E.2d 527 (Commercial Credit Corp. v. Pearson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commercial Credit Corp. v. Pearson, 208 S.E.2d 527, 23 N.C. App. 227, 1974 N.C. App. LEXIS 2059 (N.C. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

BRITT, Judge.

Defendants’ sole assignment of error is to the signing of the order denying their motion to set the judgment aside and grant them a new trial. Assuming, arguendo, that the court had authority to grant defendants’ motion, the allowance or disallowance of the motion was in the discretion of the trial judge. Defendants have failed to show abuse of discretion, therefore, the order appealed from is

Affirmed.

Judges Hedrick and Baley concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRITT, Judge.

Defendants’ sole assignment of error is to the signing of the order denying their motion to set the judgment aside and grant them a new trial. Assuming, arguendo, that the court had authority to grant defendants’ motion, the allowance or disallowance of the motion was in the discretion of the trial judge. Defendants have failed to show abuse of discretion, therefore, the order appealed from is

Affirmed.

Judges Hedrick and Baley concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

208 S.E.2d 527, 23 N.C. App. 227, 1974 N.C. App. LEXIS 2059, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commercial-credit-corp-v-pearson-ncctapp-1974.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack