Commercial Credit Corp. v. Pearson
208 S.E.2d 527, 23 N.C. App. 227, 1974 N.C. App. LEXIS 2059
Court of Appeals of North Carolina·Decided October 2, 1974·No. No. 7410DC730·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Defendants’ sole assignment of error is to the signing of the order denying their motion to set the judgment aside and grant them a new trial. Assuming, arguendo, that the court had authority to grant defendants’ motion, the allowance or disallowance of the motion was in the discretion of the trial judge. Defendants have failed to show abuse of discretion, therefore, the order appealed from is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Commercial Credit Corp. v. Pearson, 208 S.E.2d 527, 23 N.C. App. 227, 1974 N.C. App. LEXIS 2059 (N.C. Ct. App. 1974).
208 S.E.2d 527 (Commercial Credit Corp. v. Pearson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mobley v. Hill
341 S.E.2d 46 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1986)