Commercial Credit Co. v. United States

41 F.2d 991, 1930 U.S. App. LEXIS 2946
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Commercial Credit Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 33 F.2d 228
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided June 16, 1930·No. No. 5970·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

A federal prohibition agent, having discovered a person in the act of transporting intoxicating liquor in an automobile, in violation of the National Prohibition Act (27 [992]*992USCA) seized the automobile and arrested the driver. Later, the driver was prosecuted under the revenue laws, and a judgment was entered, in a separate proceeding, forfeiting the automobile under section 3450 of the Revised Statutes (26 USCA § 1181), as in Davies Motors, Inc., v. United States (C. C. A.) 35 F.(2d) 928. From the judgment of forfeiture, the present appeal is prosecuted.

The judgment is reversed on the authority of Davies Motors, Inc., v. United States, 50 S. Ct. 385, 74 L. Ed. 1016, decided by the Supreme Court May 19, 1930.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commercial Credit Co. v. United States, 41 F.2d 991, 1930 U.S. App. LEXIS 2946 (9th Cir. 1930).

41 F.2d 991 (Commercial Credit Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Richbourg Motor Co. v. United States
281 U.S. 528 (Supreme Court, 1930)
Davies Motors, Inc. v. United States
35 F.2d 928 (Ninth Circuit, 1929)