Commercial Credit Co. v. State
138 So. 917, 224 Ala. 703
Opinion
This ease was submitted without assignment of errors or brief'for appellant, in violation of the rules of practice. Rules of Practice 1 and 20.
The judgment is affirmed for want of assignment of errors.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Commercial Credit Co. v. State, 138 So. 917, 224 Ala. 703 (Ala. 1931).
138 So. 917 (Commercial Credit Co. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.