Commercial Construction Co. v. Florida Bond & Mortgage Co.

220 So. 2d 675, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 6095
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 1, 1969
DocketNo. 2062
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 220 So. 2d 675 (Commercial Construction Co. v. Florida Bond & Mortgage Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commercial Construction Co. v. Florida Bond & Mortgage Co., 220 So. 2d 675, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 6095 (Fla. Ct. App. 1969).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The general contractor, who was made a party to this mortgage foreclosure because he filed a claim of lien, appeals from a final decree in behalf of the mortgagee. We have read the transcript and considered the briefs and conclude that the trial judge did not commit reversible error in determining from the evidence that the mortgage was in default and that the plaintiff was not estopped to foreclose.

Affirmed.

WALDEN, C. J., McCAIN, J., and TROWBRIDGE, C. PFEIFFER, Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Charlotte Asphalt, Inc. v. Cape Cave Corp.
406 So. 2d 1234 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Courtney v. American Oil Company
220 So. 2d 675 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
220 So. 2d 675, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 6095, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commercial-construction-co-v-florida-bond-mortgage-co-fladistctapp-1969.