Commercial Construction Co. v. Florida Bond & Mortgage Co.
220 So. 2d 675, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 6095
Opinion
The general contractor, who was made a party to this mortgage foreclosure because he filed a claim of lien, appeals from a final decree in behalf of the mortgagee. We have read the transcript and considered the briefs and conclude that the trial judge did not commit reversible error in determining from the evidence that the mortgage was in default and that the plaintiff was not estopped to foreclose.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Commercial Construction Co. v. Florida Bond & Mortgage Co., 220 So. 2d 675, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 6095 (Fla. Ct. App. 1969).
220 So. 2d 675 (Commercial Construction Co. v. Florida Bond & Mortgage Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Charlotte Asphalt, Inc. v. Cape Cave Corp.
406 So. 2d 1234 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Courtney v. American Oil Company
220 So. 2d 675 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)