Commercial Business Sys. v. Aztec Partnership

Ohio Supreme Court

Commercial Business Sys. v. Aztec Partnership

688 N.E.2d 525, 81 Ohio St. 3d 1410, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 366

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 15, 1998

Docket97-2592

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 688 N.E.2d 525 (Commercial Business Sys. v. Aztec Partnership) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commercial Business Sys. v. Aztec Partnership, 688 N.E.2d 525, 81 Ohio St. 3d 1410, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 366 (Ohio 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

Montgomery App. No. 16363. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal. Whereas appellant has filed a memorandum in support of jurisdiction that exceeds the page limit prescribed by S.Ct.Prac.R. III(1)(C),

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the memorandum in support of jurisdiction be, and hereby is, stricken.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Montgomery App. No. 16363. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal. Whereas appellant has filed a memorandum in support of jurisdiction that exceeds the page limit prescribed by S.Ct.Prac.R. III(1)(C),

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the memorandum in support of jurisdiction be, and hereby is, stricken.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

688 N.E.2d 525, 81 Ohio St. 3d 1410, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 366, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commercial-business-sys-v-aztec-partnership-ohio-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack