Commercial Banking Corp. v. Meade

104 Pa. Super. 447
Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 5, 1932·No. Appeal No. 375·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

Pee Curiam:

The judgment is affirmed on the opinion of Judge Beoomaul.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commercial Banking Corp. v. Meade, 104 Pa. Super. 447 (Pa. Ct. App. 1932).

104 Pa. Super. 447 (Commercial Banking Corp. v. Meade) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harry Cramer, Inc. v. Morris
37 Pa. D. & C.2d 747 (Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas, 1965)
Atlantic Finance Corp. v. Kester
39 A.2d 740 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1944)
Ambler National Bank v. Maryland Credit Finance Co.
24 A.2d 123 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1941)
Commercial Inv. Trust Co. v. Minon
104 F.2d 765 (Third Circuit, 1939)
In re American Storage & Moving Co.
15 F. Supp. 950 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1936)
In re Guertler
17 F. Supp. 569 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1935)
General Credit Corp. v. Penn Securities Co.
25 Pa. D. & C. 119 (Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas, 1935)
Sunbury Fin. Co., Inc. v. Boyd M. Co.
180 A. 108 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1935)
H. L. Braham & Co. v. Surrell
176 A. 64 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1934)
General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Hartman
174 A. 795 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1934)