Commercial Bank v. Rucker

Supreme Court of Virginia

Commercial Bank v. Rucker

24 S.E. 388, 2 Va. Dec. 350, 1896 Va. LEXIS 159

CourtSupreme Court of Virginia

DecidedApril 2, 1896

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 24 S.E. 388 (Commercial Bank v. Rucker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commercial Bank v. Rucker, 24 S.E. 388, 2 Va. Dec. 350, 1896 Va. LEXIS 159 (Va. 1896).

Pincite

Opinion

Keith, P.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

In this case a bill was filed in the circuit court for the city of Lynchburg by Lucy D. Rucker v. Commercial National Bank of Lynchburg, and, the defendant having demurred, the court entered a decree sustaining the demurrer and overruling a motion for the dismissal of the bill, but granting leave to the plaintiff to file an amended bill. From this decree an appeal was allowed by one of this court. We are of opinion that it was improvidently awarded, and it is therefore dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Keith, P.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

In this case a bill was filed in the circuit court for the city of Lynchburg by Lucy D. Rucker v. Commercial National Bank of Lynchburg, and, the defendant having demurred, the court entered a decree sustaining the demurrer and overruling a motion for the dismissal of the bill, but granting leave to the plaintiff to file an amended bill. From this decree an appeal was allowed by one of this court. We are of opinion that it was improvidently awarded, and it is therefore dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

24 S.E. 388, 2 Va. Dec. 350, 1896 Va. LEXIS 159, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commercial-bank-v-rucker-va-1896.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack