Commercial Bank v. Rucker
24 S.E. 388, 2 Va. Dec. 350, 1896 Va. LEXIS 159
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
In this case a bill was filed in the circuit court for the city of Lynchburg by Lucy D. Rucker v. Commercial National Bank of Lynchburg, and, the defendant having demurred, the court entered a decree sustaining the demurrer and overruling a motion for the dismissal of the bill, but granting leave to the plaintiff to file an amended bill. From this decree an appeal was allowed by one of this court. We are of opinion that it was improvidently awarded, and it is therefore dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Commercial Bank v. Rucker, 24 S.E. 388, 2 Va. Dec. 350, 1896 Va. LEXIS 159 (Va. 1896).
24 S.E. 388 (Commercial Bank v. Rucker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Parker v. Carilion Clinic
819 S.E.2d 809 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 2018)
Min Kyu Sue v. Sung Hoon Park
70 Va. Cir. 113 (Fairfax County Circuit Court, 2005)
Sweet Briar Institute v. Button
280 F. Supp. 312 (W.D. Virginia, 1967)
Bibber v. McCreary
73 S.E.2d 382 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1952)
Baber v. Page
120 S.E. 137 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1923)
Garrett v. Garrett
112 S.E. 494 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1922)