Commercial Bank v. Iola
This text of 154 U.S. 617 (Commercial Bank v. Iola) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
The only difference between this case and that of The Citizens’ Bank v. Topeka, just decided, (Loan Association v. Topeka, 20 Wall. 655,) is that the bonds were issued before the general act of February 29, 1872, there being at that time no statute of Kansas which professed to authorize the proceeding. But after the vote in favor of issuing the bonds, an act of the legislature ratified the vote and authorized the city officers to deliver the bonds and to levy the taxes necessary to pay their principal and interest. They were issued to a private corporation to aid in construct-, ing and operating foundry and machine shops.
This is all that is necessary to be said, and it shows that the [618]*618case comes within the principles of the one just decided, and that the judgment of the Circuit Court holding the bonds void must be
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
154 U.S. 617, 14 S. Ct. 1199, 1875 U.S. LEXIS 1321, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commercial-bank-v-iola-scotus-1875.