Commercial Bank v. Foltz
50 N.Y.S. 1125
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Commercial Bank v. Foltz. Read the opinion of the Court — 13 A.D. 603 →
Opinion
No opinion. Order of July 2d, denying motion to correct an order granted June 11, 1896, and order denying motion to strike out Catto’s amended answer, and denying motion to vacate another order granted June 11, 1896, which vacated an order denying plaintiff’s motion to strike out the amended answer of Catto, affirmed, without costs to either party. See 41 N. Y. Supp. 183.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Commercial Bank v. Foltz, 50 N.Y.S. 1125 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1898).
50 N.Y.S. 1125 (Commercial Bank v. Foltz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Commercial Bank v. Foltz
41 N.Y.S. 183 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1896)