Commercial Bank & Trust Co. v. Donehoo

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Commercial Bank & Trust Co. v. Donehoo

183 S.E.2d 628, 124 Ga. App. 378, 1971 Ga. App. LEXIS 925

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided September 7, 1971·No. 46271·Published

Opinion

Eberhardt, Judge.

Since neither the appellant’s brief nor the enumeration of errors makes a single reference to the pages of [379] the record, the enumerations are considered as abandoned and the judgment is affirmed. Law v. Smith, 226 Ga. 298 (174 SE2d 893) and citations.

Argued June 4, 1971 Decided September 7, 1971. Seay & Sims, Clifford Seay, for appellant. Smalley & Cogburn, John M. Cogburn, Jr., for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

Hall, P. J., and Whitman, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eberhardt, Judge.

Since neither the appellant’s brief nor the enumeration of errors makes a single reference to the pages of [379] the record, the enumerations are considered as abandoned and the judgment is affirmed. Law v. Smith, 226 Ga. 298 (174 SE2d 893) and citations.

Argued June 4, 1971 Decided September 7, 1971. Seay & Sims, Clifford Seay, for appellant. Smalley & Cogburn, John M. Cogburn, Jr., for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

Hall, P. J., and Whitman, J., concur.

Commercial Bank & Trust Co. v. Donehoo, 183 S.E.2d 628, 124 Ga. App. 378, 1971 Ga. App. LEXIS 925 (Ga. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

183 S.E.2d 628 (Commercial Bank & Trust Co. v. Donehoo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related