Commercial Bank of Buffalo v. Love

19 Wend. 98
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 15, 1838
StatusPublished

This text of 19 Wend. 98 (Commercial Bank of Buffalo v. Love) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commercial Bank of Buffalo v. Love, 19 Wend. 98 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1838).

Opinion

By the Court,

Bronson, J.

The plea puis darrein is inequitable and unjust, and must be stricken out. If the . defendant wishes to avail himself of any defence existing previous to the payment, he has a right to do so, and if he so elects, the plaintiffs must notice the cause for trial; otherwise they have leave to discontinue without costs.

Rule accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 Wend. 98, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commercial-bank-of-buffalo-v-love-nysupct-1838.