Commerce Bank, N.A. v. Stewart

321 S.W.3d 387, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1017, 2010 WL 2898801
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 27, 2010·No. WD 71301·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM:

Michael Shane Stewart and Jennifer Stewart (“the Stewarts”) appeal the judgment of the Circuit Court of Platte County (“trial court”) which was entered in favor of Commerce Bank, N.A. In their appeal, the Stewarts argue that the trial court erred in either ruling against the weight of the evidence or misapplying the law, in that: (1) the Stewarts claim the subject transaction was void; and (2) the Stewarts argue that a promissory note given to secure purchase money for a sales transaction that is void is unenforceable due to lack of consideration. We affirm in this per curiam order and have provided the parties a memorandum detailing the basis for our ruling today. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commerce Bank, N.A. v. Stewart, 321 S.W.3d 387, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1017, 2010 WL 2898801 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

321 S.W.3d 387 (Commerce Bank, N.A. v. Stewart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Riddle
321 S.W.3d 387 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)