COMMEAU v. MAGNUSSON
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
MICHAEL EDWARD COMMEAU, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Docket No. 1:21-cv-00055-NT ) MATTHEW MAGNUSSON, ) ) Defendant. )
ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
On March 2, 2021, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court, with a copy to the Petitioner, his Recommended Decision on the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 3). The Petitioner filed an objection to the Recommended Decision on March 24, 2021 (ECF No. 6). I have reviewed and considered the Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in the Recommended Decision and determine that no further proceeding is necessary. It is therefore ORDERED that the Petitioner’s objection is OVERRULED and that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. The Petitioner’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition (ECF No. 1) is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice.
It is further ORDERED that no certificate of appealability should issue in the event the Petitioner files a notice of appeal, because no jurist of reason would find the correctness of this ruling to be debatable. See Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).
SO ORDERED. /s/ Nancy Torresen United States District Judge Dated this 21st day of April, 2021.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
COMMEAU v. MAGNUSSON (COMMEAU v. MAGNUSSON) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.