Commarrilo v. State

164 Tex. Crim. 319
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 27, 1957
DocketNo. 28,841
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 164 Tex. Crim. 319 (Commarrilo v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commarrilo v. State, 164 Tex. Crim. 319 (Tex. 1957).

Opinion

MORRISON, Presiding Judge.

The offense is the possession of whiskey in a dry area; the punishment, 30 days in jail and a fine of $200.00.

Our state’s attorney has confessed error herein, and we agree.

[320]*320Bill of Exception No. 5 reflects that the witness Armstrong was called by the appellant on the issue of his reputation. The bill recites that the court refused to permit the witness to testify and that, if he had been permitted to, he would have given testimony that he was well acquainted with the defendant and his general reputation in the community in which he lived, and that said general reputation of the defendant as being a peaceable and law-abiding citizen was good.

This is such a certificate of error as is binding upon this court. Jean v. State, 163 Texas Crim Rep. 533, 294 S.W. 2d 406, and Johnson v. State, 138 Texas Cr. Rep. 188, 135 S.W. 2d 485.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hicks v. State
493 S.W.2d 833 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1973)
Foley v. State
356 S.W.2d 686 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1962)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
164 Tex. Crim. 319, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commarrilo-v-state-texcrimapp-1957.