Commarrilo v. State

299 S.W.2d 128, 164 Tex. Crim. 319, 1957 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2100
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided February 27, 1957·No. No. 28841·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

MORRISON, Presiding Judge.

The offense is the possession of whiskey in a dry area; the punishment, 30 days in jail and a fine of $200.

Our State’s Attorney has confessed error herein, and we agree.

Bill of exception No. S reflects that the witness Armstrong was called by the appellant on the issue of his reputation. The bill recites that the court refused to permit the witness to testify and that, if he had been permitted to, he would have given testimony that he was well acquainted with the defendant and his general reputation in the community in which he lived, and that said general reputation of the defendant as being a peaceable and law-abiding citizen was good.

This is such a certificate of error as is binding upon this Court. Jean v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 294 S.W.2d 406, and Johnson v. State, 138 Tex.Cr.R. 188, 135 S.W.2d 485.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commarrilo v. State, 299 S.W.2d 128, 164 Tex. Crim. 319, 1957 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2100 (Tex. 1957).

299 S.W.2d 128 (Commarrilo v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hicks v. State
493 S.W.2d 833 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1973)
Foley v. State
172 Tex. Crim. 261 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1962)