Comm. v. Richardson, T., of D. Waltman, Esq.
This text of Comm. v. Richardson, T., of D. Waltman, Esq. (Comm. v. Richardson, T., of D. Waltman, Esq.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : No. 52 MM 2023 : : v. : : : TODD ANDREW RICHARDSON : : : : PETITION OF: DOUGLAS J. WALTMAN, : ESQUIRE :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 27th day of September, 2023, in consideration of the Petition to
Withdraw as Counsel, this matter is REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas of Berks
County to determine whether to permit Attorney Douglas J. Waltman to withdraw. In the
event Attorney Waltman is allowed to withdraw, the court is to resolve any related
questions, including whether to permit Todd Andrew Richardson to proceed pro se on
allocatur review or to appoint new counsel.
The Court of Common Pleas of Berks County is DIRECTED to enter its order on
remand with 90 days and to promptly notify this Court of its determination.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Comm. v. Richardson, T., of D. Waltman, Esq., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/comm-v-richardson-t-of-d-waltman-esq-pa-2023.