Comm. v. Brown, J. of G. Davidson, Esq.
This text of Comm. v. Brown, J. of G. Davidson, Esq. (Comm. v. Brown, J. of G. Davidson, Esq.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : No. 16 MM 2018 : : v. : : : JORDON SCOTT BROWN : : : PETITION OF: GREGORY EUGENE : DAVIDSON, ESQUIRE :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 27th day of March, 2018, in consideration of the Application for
Leave to Withdraw as Counsel, this matter is REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas
of Huntingdon County for that court to determine whether Petitioner’s lawyer should be
granted leave to withdraw. See Pa.R.Crim.P. 120(B) (providing that an attorney may not
unilaterally withdraw his or her appearance with respect to a criminal defendant; rather,
a court must determine whether leave to withdraw is warranted).
If the attorney is permitted to withdraw, the court is DIRECTED to resolve any
issues relative to Petitioner being appointed counsel or granted leave to proceed pro se.
The Court of Common Pleas of Huntingdon County is DIRECTED to enter its order
regarding this remand within 45 days and to promptly notify this Court of its determination.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Comm. v. Brown, J. of G. Davidson, Esq., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/comm-v-brown-j-of-g-davidson-esq-pa-2018.