Comly v. Goldsmith
2 Miles 133
CourtPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
DecidedSeptember 11, 1837
StatusPublished
This text of 2 Miles 133 (Comly v. Goldsmith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Comly v. Goldsmith, 2 Miles 133 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1837).
Opinion
This affidavit is altogether insufficient. The nature of the indebtedness is not stated, or the contract or transaction on which it is founded.
Rule absolute.
Vide Kelly v. Kintzing; Benedict v. Whartenby; McCanles v. Frederickson and Young v. Corder, in this volume, and the index.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
2 Miles 133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/comly-v-goldsmith-pactcomplphilad-1837.