Com'lth ex rel. Fernberger v. Butterworth

28 A. 507, 160 Pa. 55, 1894 Pa. LEXIS 761
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedFebruary 26, 1894
DocketAppeal, No. 18
StatusPublished

This text of 28 A. 507 (Com'lth ex rel. Fernberger v. Butterworth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Com'lth ex rel. Fernberger v. Butterworth, 28 A. 507, 160 Pa. 55, 1894 Pa. LEXIS 761 (Pa. 1894).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

On presentation of the suggestion in this case the defendant was ruled to show cause why a writ of quo warranto should not be issued against him as therein prayed for, etc. The case hav[57]*57ing been heard on the suggestion and defendant’s answer, the rule was discharged, and thereupon this certiorari was issued.

An examination of the record has satisfied us that the case was rightly disposed of by- the court of common pleas. Its judgment is therefore affirmed; and it is ordered that the relator, Henry Fernberger, pay the costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 A. 507, 160 Pa. 55, 1894 Pa. LEXIS 761, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/comlth-ex-rel-fernberger-v-butterworth-pa-1894.