Comins v. Jones
This text of 54 Vt. 560 (Comins v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The opinion of the court was delivered by
The motion to quash was made by the defendant Jones, upon whom service of the writ had been made. The defendants are alleged to have been late partners in business ; and the residence of defendant Jones is described as being in Cornwall, in this State, and that of Munson as being in Salt Lake City. The statute, sec. 1405, R. L., prescribes the manner of giving notice to a party against whom a suit is brought before the Supreme or County Court, who is absent from the State at the time of the service of the writ. The defendant upon whom legal service had been made had no right to have the writ quashed upon motion at the term of court to which it was made returnable, for the want of service upon his co-defendant, or because no excuse is rendered by the officer making the return upon the writ, for not serving it.
It is the right of the plaintiff upon the return of the writ, to procure such orders as the court are authorized by law to make, to enable him to make service upon, or give notice to, the nonresident defendant.
The motion was properly overruled, and the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
54 Vt. 560, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/comins-v-jones-vt-1882.