Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Comesanas v. State

Comesanas v. State

246 So. 3d 565
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 6, 2018·No. No. 3D18–554·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Baker v. State, 878 So.2d 1236 (Fla. 2004) (holding that habeas corpus may not be used as a substitute for an otherwise procedurally-barred or time-barred motion for postconviction relief pursuant to rule 3.850); Jenkins v. State, 6 So.3d 71 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) ; Thompson v. State, 994 So.2d 1176 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) ; Griffin v. State, 976 So.2d 107 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) ; Thomas v. State, 949 So.2d 319 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) ; Barnard v. State, 949 So.2d 250 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Comesanas v. State, 246 So. 3d 565 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

246 So. 3d 565 (Comesanas v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jenkins v. State
6 So. 3d 71 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
Griffin v. State
976 So. 2d 107 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Baker v. State
29 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 105 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2004)
Thomas v. State
949 So. 2d 319 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Barnard v. State
949 So. 2d 250 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Thompson v. State
994 So. 2d 1176 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)