Comesanas v. State

246 So. 3d 565
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 6, 2018
DocketNo. 3D18–554
StatusPublished

This text of 246 So. 3d 565 (Comesanas v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Comesanas v. State, 246 So. 3d 565 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Baker v. State, 878 So.2d 1236 (Fla. 2004) (holding that habeas corpus may not be used as a substitute for an otherwise procedurally-barred or time-barred motion for postconviction relief pursuant to rule 3.850); Jenkins v. State, 6 So.3d 71 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) ; Thompson v. State, 994 So.2d 1176 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) ; Griffin v. State, 976 So.2d 107 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) ; Thomas v. State, 949 So.2d 319 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) ; Barnard v. State, 949 So.2d 250 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jenkins v. State
6 So. 3d 71 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
Griffin v. State
976 So. 2d 107 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Baker v. State
29 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 105 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2004)
Thomas v. State
949 So. 2d 319 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Barnard v. State
949 So. 2d 250 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Thompson v. State
994 So. 2d 1176 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
246 So. 3d 565, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/comesanas-v-state-fladistctapp-2018.