Comesana v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Comesana v. State

831 So. 2d 819, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 18118, 2002 WL 31757441

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 11, 2002

DocketNo. 3D01-1982

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 831 So. 2d 819 (Comesana v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Comesana v. State, 831 So. 2d 819, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 18118, 2002 WL 31757441 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence as we find any claimed error on the challenged evidentiary rulings to be invited and/or harmless. See Czubak v. State, 570 So.2d 925, 928 (Fla.1990)(under invited error doctrine, party may not make or invite error and then take advantage of error on appeal); Phillips v. State, 739 So.2d 632, 632 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999)(eviden-tiary issues were subject to harmless error analysis and not reversible when they did not affect the verdict).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence as we find any claimed error on the challenged evidentiary rulings to be invited and/or harmless. See Czubak v. State, 570 So.2d 925, 928 (Fla.1990)(under invited error doctrine, party may not make or invite error and then take advantage of error on appeal); Phillips v. State, 739 So.2d 632, 632 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999)(eviden-tiary issues were subject to harmless error analysis and not reversible when they did not affect the verdict).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

831 So. 2d 819, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 18118, 2002 WL 31757441, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/comesana-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack