Comesana v. State
831 So. 2d 819, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 18118, 2002 WL 31757441
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 11, 2002·No. No. 3D01-1982·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence as we find any claimed error on the challenged evidentiary rulings to be invited and/or harmless. See Czubak v. State, 570 So.2d 925, 928 (Fla.1990)(under invited error doctrine, party may not make or invite error and then take advantage of error on appeal); Phillips v. State, 739 So.2d 632, 632 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999)(eviden-tiary issues were subject to harmless error analysis and not reversible when they did not affect the verdict).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Comesana v. State, 831 So. 2d 819, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 18118, 2002 WL 31757441 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).
831 So. 2d 819 (Comesana v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Comesana
904 So. 2d 462 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)