Comerica Bank v. Ernest Bateson
This text of Comerica Bank v. Ernest Bateson (Comerica Bank v. Ernest Bateson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
September 30, 2013 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice
147286 Michael F. Cavanagh Stephen J. Markman Mary Beth Kelly Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack COMERICA BANK, David F. Viviano, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices
v SC: 147286 COA: 314784 Washtenaw CC: 10-000354-CZ ERNEST K. BATESON, Defendant-Appellant, and WASHTENAW COUNTY TREASURER and TOWNSHIP OF SCIO, Defendants-Appellees.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 20, 2013 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. September 30, 2013 t0923 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Comerica Bank v. Ernest Bateson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/comerica-bank-v-ernest-bateson-mich-2013.