Comerford v. Hogsett

79 F.2d 486, 1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 4158
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided October 16, 1935·No. No. 3028·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal to this court from an order of the federal District Court for Massachusetts of December 3,. 1934, dismissing the appellant’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus. It appears that the appellant is confined in the state prison at Charlestown, Mass., serving a sentence, and is there held under process of the state court. The appeal is not accompanied by a certificate of probable cause as now required to give this court jurisdiction to entertain such an appeal. USCA, title 28, § 466 (43 Stat. 940, § 6 (d), Act of March 10, 1908, c. 76 (35 Stat. 40). In this situation the appeal must be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See Bilik v. Strassheim, 212 U. S. 551, 29 S. Ct. 684, 53 L. Ed. 649; Ex parte Patrick, 212 U. S. 555, 29 S. Ct. 686, 53 L. Ed. 650; In re Graves (C. C. A.) 270 F. 181, 187.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Comerford v. Hogsett, 79 F.2d 486, 1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 4158 (1st Cir. 1935).

79 F.2d 486 (Comerford v. Hogsett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Millslagle v. Olson
125 F.2d 546 (Eighth Circuit, 1942)
Schenk v. Plummer
113 F.2d 726 (Ninth Circuit, 1940)
Wilson v. Lanagan
79 F.2d 702 (First Circuit, 1935)