Comer v. State

591 So. 2d 17, 1991 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 2654, 1991 WL 275013
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama·Decided November 15, 1991·No. CR-89-14·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ON REMAND FROM THE ALABAMA SUPREME COURT

PATTERSON, Presiding Judge.

Pursuant to the judgment of the Alabama Supreme Court in Comer v. State, 591 So.2d 13 (Ala.1991), this cause is remanded to the trial court with instructions to conduct a hearing to determine whether the prior statement of the defendant, Shirley Comer, which was used by the state for impeachment purposes at her trial, was voluntary or was the product of coercion or involuntary influences.

The trial court shall take all action directed to permit the circuit clerk to make a proper return to this court at the earliest possible time within 60 days of the release of this opinion.

REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

All Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Comer v. State, 591 So. 2d 17, 1991 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 2654, 1991 WL 275013 (Ala. Ct. App. 1991).

591 So. 2d 17 (Comer v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Comer v. State
611 So. 2d 1118 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1992)