Comer v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Comer v. State

591 So. 2d 17, 1991 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 2654, 1991 WL 275013

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

DecidedNovember 15, 1991

DocketCR-89-14

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 591 So. 2d 17 (Comer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Comer v. State, 591 So. 2d 17, 1991 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 2654, 1991 WL 275013 (Ala. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

ON REMAND FROM THE ALABAMA SUPREME COURT

PATTERSON, Presiding Judge.

Pursuant to the judgment of the Alabama Supreme Court in Comer v. State, 591 So.2d 13 (Ala.1991), this cause is remanded to the trial court with instructions to conduct a hearing to determine whether the prior statement of the defendant, Shirley Comer, which was used by the state for impeachment purposes at her trial, was voluntary or was the product of coercion or involuntary influences.

The trial court shall take all action directed to permit the circuit clerk to make a proper return to this court at the earliest possible time within 60 days of the release of this opinion.

REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

All Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI